“Patients don’t go to their doctors thinking their records are going to end up in India”

 

Cost-cutting puts lives in danger

 

COST-CUTTING doctors are breaching privacy laws and could be endangering patients' lives by sending medical files overseas to be typed up cheaply. An investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has re­vealed a growing number of Australian hospitals and medical practices are outs­ourcing secretarial work o companies in India, Paki­stan and the Philippines. At least four big Sydney hospitals and hundreds of doctors are among those using cheap labour to transcribe digitally recorded verbal notes online. Prices can be half as much as the Australian rate, or less. But rivals claim foreign workers, most of whom do not have English as their first language, are more prone to making dangerous mistakes and may be un­able to keep patients' priv­ate details secure. One expert warned that getting key medical terms wrong in patients' records could prove lethal. "If you mix them up, you're dead meat," she said.

 

Some overseas compan­ies have recorded potent­ially fatal errors in tran­scripts, such as confusing "hypo", which means too low, with "hyper", which means too high. This could lead to a pat­ient being given the wrong treatment, making their condition worse or even life threatening rather than correcting it. State and Common­wealth laws ban the send­ing of medical information overseas unless privacy protection is of the same standard as in Australia.

 

Carolyn Adams, senior legal officer at the Australian Law Reform Commission, told The Sunday Telelgraph the commission was concerned about the inter­national flow of personal medical data. A crackdown is antici­pated after changes to nat­ional privacy laws, which are being reviewed. "If you're going to send information overseas, you have to make sure that country has the same priv­acy laws," Ms Adams said. Among possible solutions were making it mandatory for transcription compan­ies to declare if they were sending medical files over­seas or prosecuting those who sent, information to places with inadequate protection, she said. I'm sure some doctors don't know whether it's going overseas or not, be­cause there's no obligation for these companies to tell them," Ms Adams said.

Lyndie Arkell, chief exec­utive of the wholly Austral­ian transcription service OzeScribe, described the quality of overseas tran­scriptions as "absolutely terrible".

"There is a large industry sending work to India be­cause there are doctors who want cheaper transcript­ions," she said.

"But they are violating privacy laws and disre­specting their patients' privacy. I don't think pat­ients go to their doctors thinking their records are going to end up in India."

Mistakes and mix-ups in medical terminology are common among overseas transcribers who cannot understand Australian acc­ents, she warned.

Examples included con­fusion between "hypo" and "hyper" and "perineum" and "peritoneum".

She told how overseas transcription companies had left leaflets at hospitals offering to do work for 8c a line, compared with an aver­

age Australian rate of 27c.

Raji Swaminathan runs Sydney-based Professional Transcription Solutions, which has 50 staff at a centre in Chennai, India. and has four big Sydney hospitals and more than 150 doctors signed up to her service.

Ms Swarninathan insists her staff work for an Aust­ralian company and are properly trained to under­stand Australian accents.

"All staff sign confiden­tiality agreements for me," she said.

Denis O'Brien, of Minter Ellison Lawyers, warned firms breaching privacy laws could be prosecuted by the Privacy Commissioner.