UPDATE –
SEPTEMBER PART TWO
ARE
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION PARTIES ACCOUNTABILITY, NON-EXISTENT, A SHAM,
A COVER
UP OR ALL OF THE ABOVE
On Friday,
August 6, 2004 a colleague put the following proposition to the Howard Coalition
Government on the 2SM Grant Goldman Breakfast Show at 5:15am.
“Grant, if
we’re to get honesty, Democracy and Accountability from Government, now would
be perfect timing, for the Prime Minister and his Coalition Government in
tandem with the Cross Media and their Political Commentators to present to the
Australian public all the concessions that were conceded re: the Free Trade
Agreement (FTA) with the United States.
We are not
asking for the 1,000 plus pages of the Agreement, we would be contented with
the two page brief summary of the concessions conceded. A comparable summary that was available to
the American public for their perusal by the Bush Government would be
sufficient, allowing Australians to deem the value of the FTA. If the Howard Coalition
is found to be truthful re: the benefits of FTA it can only be a plus for the
re-election of his Government and at the same time allay the fears Australians
have endured for the past couple of months.
In fact Grant,
if I was Mark Latham I would demand that Mr. Howard and Minister for Trade Mark
Vaille reveal all in Layman’s language.
Remember, it’s
the Australian Taxpayers who finance their generous superannuation package and
pay their wages. Its time for our
elected Federal Members and their Bureaucrats to put their heads down and bums
up and reveal the truth, and nothing but the truth, re: the Free Trade
Agreement.”
The following
Trade Facts Summary was made available to the American Public by the Executive
Office of the United States President.
We want all
concerned Australians to study and carefully evaluate the concessions conceded
to the U.S. For those who have
difficulties in understanding the “Trade Facts,” if you return to our main page
– Index – Update August, you will find a simplified interpretation of the FTA,
Allowing, that
blind Freddy can see that there are a lot more concerns with the FTA than just
the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Television Content, one wonders
why the Howard Coalition and the Opposition Parties continue to minimize the
true impact that will be imposed on all Australians.
Trade Facts
Office
of the United States Trade Representative
Washington,
DC February 8, 2004
U.S.
Australia Free Trade Agreement
Brief
Summary of the Agreement
An FTA for America’s Manufacturing
Sector: More than 99 percent of U.S.
manufactured exports to Australia will become duty-free immediately upon entry
into force of the Agreement. This is
the most significant immediate reduction of industrial tariffs ever achieved in
a U.S. FTA, and will provide benefits for America’s manufacturing workers and
companies; U.S. manufacturers estimate that the elimination of tariffs could
result in $2 billion per year in increased U.S. exports of manufactured goods. There will be significant benefits for such
key U.S. manufacturing sectors as autos
and auto parts; chemicals, plastics and soda ash; information technology
products; electrical equipment and appliances; non-electrical machinery;
fabricated metal products; construction equipment; paper and wood products;
furniture and fixtures; and medical and scientific equipment.
|
Two-way
annual Goods
and services Trade
with Australia is about
$28 billion, and the
U.S. has a $9
billion trade surplus with
Australia. Australia
is America’s 9th
largest goods export market. |
New Opportunities for U.S.
Farmers:
All U.S. agricultural exports to Australia, totaling more that $400 million,
will receive immediate duty-free access.
Key agricultural products that will benefit from immediate tariff
elimination include processed foods, soups and bakery products, fruit and vegetable juices, dried plums,
potatoes, almonds, tomatoes, cherries, raisins, olives, fresh grapes, sweet
corn, frozen strawberries, and walnuts.
Food inspection procedures that have posed barriers in the past will be
addressed, benefiting sectors such as pork, citrus, apples and stone fruit.
Sensitive to Agricultural
Concerns: The FTA is sensitive to concerns that have
been expressed by Congress and U.S. beef and dairy farmers, and the agreement
uses tariff-rates quotas (TRQ) to respond to these concerns while increasing
trade. Beef: U.S. above-quota duties
will be phased out over an 18-year period, and initial increased imports from
Australia under the TRQ quota will amount to about 0.17% of annual U.S. beef
production, and 1.6% of annual U.S. beef imports. The quota increases will take effect when U.S. beef exports
return to their 2003 (pre-BSE) levels, or three years after effective date of
the agreement, whichever comes first.
Safeguards will be available, including a price-based safe guard after
the transition period. Dairy: There will be no change in the U.S. MFN
above-quota tariff on dairy products subject to quotas, and initial increases
in imports from Australia under the TRQ quota will amount to about 0.17% of the
value annual U.S. dairy production, and about 2% of the value of total U.S.
dairy imports.
Access to Services and
Investment: Australia will accord
substantial market access across its entire services regime, offering access in
sectors such as telecommunications, express delivery, computer and related
services, tourism, energy, construction and engineering, financial services,
insurance, audio/visual and entertainment, professional, environmental,
education and training, and other services sectors. In broadcasting and audiovisual services, the FTA contains
important and unprecedented provisions to improve market access for U.S. films
and television programs over a variety of media including cable, satellite, and
the Internet. Most U.S. investments
would be exempted from screening by the Australian Foreign Investment Review
Board.
Recognizing the Importance of
innovative Pharmaceuticals: The U.S. and Australia note
the importance of ongoing research and development; of recognizing and
appropriately valuing the therapeutic benefit of innovative drugs; and of
transparent, expeditious, and accountable procedures. In implementing these principles, Australia will make a number of
improvements in its Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) procedures that will
enhance transparency and accountability in the operation of the PBS, including
establishment of an independent process to review determinations of product
listings. The FTA establishes a
Medicines Working Group to further promote the agreement’s public health
principles through an ongoing dialogue between the United States and
Australia. In addition, the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration and the Australia Therapeutic Goods Administration will
work together to make innovative medical products available more quickly.
Open and Fair Government
Procurement: U.S. suppliers are granted
non-discriminatory rights to bid on contracts from 80 Australian central
government entities, including key ministries and government enterprises. These commitments are particularly
significant and commercially important, because Australia is one of the only
developed countries that is not a party to the WTO Agreement on Government
Procurement. Both countries are also
committed to extending coverage of the agreement to sub-central entities, and
will be working with their respective states to refine the extent of the
coverage in the next few weeks.
Australia will eliminate its central government industry development
programs, under which suppliers have had to provide various types of offsets as
a condition of their contracts.
A Trade Agreement for the Digital
Age: U.S. and Australian authors, performers,
inventors, and other producers of creative material will benefit from the
higher and extended standards the FTA requires for protecting intellectual
property rights such as copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets and
enhanced means for enforcing those rights.
The agreement calls for each government to adopt state-of-the-art
protection for digital products such as software, music, text, and videos, and
encourages adoption of measures to promote trade through electronic commerce.
Strong Protections for Worker
Rights and the Environment: Ensures effective
enforcement of labor and environment laws and establishes labor and
environmental cooperative mechanisms.
Increased Transparency: The agreement’s dispute settlement
mechanisms call for open public hearings, public access to documents, and the
opportunity for third parties to submit views.
Transparency in customs operations will aid express delivery shipments
and will require open and public processes for customs rulings and administration.
FACT FILE
Or what
our politicians hope you’ll forget
By Gareth
Kimberley
WHO TO
VOTE FOR, LIBERAL OR LABOR
Is there any
real difference between Liberal and Labor? Of course! The Liberal/National
Coalition is acknowledged as being superior to Labor in the management of the
nation’s finances. But hang on, after
producing one of the most fiscally sound and generous budgets of recent times
the Coalition suffered a drop in the polls with a decided swing to Labor. So does the difference in economic
management skill mean anything to the voters?
Apparently not,
Labor has stated its policy, is to get rid of the crown, change our
constitution, change our flag and turn Australia into a multicultural,
socialist republic.
The Howard
Government on the other hand “remains of the views that Australia is
well-served by the current constitutional arrangements for our head of
state.” But wait a minute, Howard will
soon be forced to hand over to Peter Costello, an avowed republican! And who will be manipulating the levers of
power then? Why he and his good pals
John Anderson, Alexander Downer, Bruce Baird, Malcolm Turnbull etc, etc. All of them rabid republicans!
The Howard
Government is determined to sell off the rest of Telstra whilst Labor has
declared it opposes the sale. But wait
just a moment, Labor was opposed to the GST which John Howard said we would
never have. We got the GST anyway.
Labor’s policy
on Iraq is to cut and run but the Howard Government’s policy is not all that
different. It will remain in Iraq only
for as long as it is required to do so by its American buddies.
But Labor is
socialist and the Liberals are capitalists aren’t they? Yes, but they are both working for the same
masters with the same long term aim-globalisation and total corporate
domination of the planet. In the
meantime, without a credible third party, Australian voters continue to be torn
between the devil and the deep blue sea.
So what about voting for the Greens or the Democrates? Forget it! The Greens are a negative single
issue party while the Democrats are even further left than Labor.
As some one
recently said, probably the best way to vote is to look for an Independent with
policies you support and give him or her your first preference, putting
Liberal-National and Labor second last and last in that order or the other way
around if you lean to the left.
A
TREACHEROUS TRIUMUIRATE
There exists a
tightly interlocked triangle made up of politicians, bureaucrats and corporate
barons that is now ruling the country in its own interests and is hiding its
activities behind the smokescreen of free trade and globalisation. Using the media it seeks to convince the
Australian people that globalisation is inevitable.
One of the master minds behind this not so
subtle push is our smarmy Treasurer and IMF (International Monetary Fund) guru
Peter Costello. Remember his immortal
words, “Complaining about globalisation is like complaining about the
telephone.”
The
Howard/Costello Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. is of course supported by the
opposition and American big business.
Permission to
republish “Fact File” by Gareth Kimberley was granted by the Strategy Editor,
Ray Platt who continues to fight for Liberty and Justice.
Should you be
interested in subscribing to the Strategy Publication you can contact the
Editor on: PH: (03) 5182 6002
FAX: (03) 5182 6042
Email: strategy@net_tech.com.au
OR: Mail to: The Strategy
344
Commercial Road
Victoria
3971
Now that you’re
aware of the American version of the concessions conceded by the Howard
Government, one has to ask, why have Talk Back radio hosts continued to debate
the PBS and Television content only?
With the exception of 2SM and Grant Goldman’s Breakfast Show which has
allowed his listeners for and against the FTA to contribute to the debate which
has been aired through the Super-Network relays between 5 and 6am week days.
The relay
stations include:
2 AD - ARMIDALE
2 DU - DUBBO
2 GF - GRAFTON
2
LM - LISMORE
2 MO - MUDGEE
2 MC - GUNNEDAH
2 NZ - INVERELL
2 PK - PARKES
2 RE - TAREE
2 TM - TAMWORTH
2 VM - MOREE
RADIO
97 - TWEED HEADS
4 GY - GYMPIE
4 WK - TOOWOOMBA
With the exception
of Grant Goldman the other Talk-Back radio hosts have failed to address the
lopsided FTA in favour of the United States.
I.e. Manufacturing, U.S. Farmers, Agriculture, Services and Investment
Access, Innovative Pharmaceuticals and Open and Fair Government Procurement
etc, etc.
Two examples
that the Cross-Media have failed to put up for debate
(1) Food inspection procedures that have
posed barriers for the United States in the past will be addressed, benefiting
sectors such as Pork, Citrus, Apples and Stone Fruit.
(2) Most United States investments would be
exempted from screening by the Foreign Investment Review Board.
It was remiss
of us to overlook another print media the Sydney Morning Herald’s Editor
responsible for election comment Robert Whitehead who also failed to highlight
all the concessions conceded to the United States re: the FTA
IS PRIME
MINISTER HOWARD’S NICK-NAME
“HONEST
JOHN,” A MISNOMER?
We are going to
provide evidence that prove Mr. Howard and his government have little credibility
are unaccountable for their actions and turns a blind eye to “Law and Order.”
In 2003, a
former law enforcement Customs Officer Robert Spanswick issued a summons
against NSW Labor Premier Bob Carr re: his Governments invalid and illegal drug
legislation which led to the licensing of the Kings Cross trial heroin
injecting room.
Under the
crimes act Robert had to contact all State, Territorial and the Federal
Attorney – General re: his litigation, because the injecting room is not a
direct concern to himself, and therefore needed the then Federal Attorney –
General Daryl William’s permission for the case to continue.
Several
concerned citizens corresponded with the Federal Attorney-General and Prime
Minister Howard alerting them to the fact that the Carr Labor Government’s drug
law legislation breaches section 109 of the Australian Constitution which in
turn breaches Federal Law.
They were not
arguing the merits of the drug legislation but the Constitutional impropriety
and Federal offences committed by the Carr State Government. When you consider the Howard Government
spent 100 million dollars plus to retain a Constitutional Monarchy all paid for
by the Australian Taxpayer.
In fact the
Howard Government and Opposition Parties both in Federal and NSW State, by
turning a blind eye to these offences are in fact guilty of breaching Federal
Laws themselves.
If you want the
full text of evidence from the aforementioned State and Federal Government
cover ups, return to our website main page and hit the Link >>>>
Invalid Drug Laws.
When mistakes
are made by Government Ministers they more than often will point the finger at
their advisors, the Bureaucrats. The
Bureaucrats are Nocturnal Creatures, who in the main have no hands on
experience in the Government Agencies they control, are never elected and
generally rarely seen.
Regardless of
the bad advice a Minister receives the buck stops with them. It doesn’t matter how many changes of Government
we have the majority of the Bureaucrats retain control of their particular
agency, no matter what the result.
One wonders if
the debate about the PBS and Television content re: the FTA by the Howard
Government and the Labor Opposition in reality is a Bi-Partisan political
red-herring for their audience, the Australian Public.
The Bush
Administration made available the full benefits of the FTA with Australia to
the American people, and yet the Howard Government and the Latham Labor
opposition have gone to extremes to ensure the Australian People know as little
as possible about the deal.
If you doubt
that the two major political parties don’t work together against the will of
the Australian People then study the evidence which will prove otherwise.
On October 22,
2002 two workers were killed and three others were seriously injured, when the
Lake Cargelligo water tower they were working on collapsed. This was a NSW Carr Labor Government project
in which four of the five aforementioned workers including one deceased were
taking Australian jobs by working for sweat wages.
These workers
were imported by the winning company who also brought their own scaffolding
equipment from their country of origin.
Twenty one
months has passed since this tragedy and still the Howard Government has failed
to instigate an Independent inquiry.
Why? How did these South African
workers get their work visas?
How many more
illegal immigrants are working for slave wages in our country?
The Lake
Cargelligo Tragedy is on our main page Link
>>>> Gats Trial
If you are
truly concerned by the way in which we are being abused by the major political
parties, we suggest you find time in your busy schedule to carefully peruse our
entire website so that when the federal election is due you will be in a
position to cast an educated vote.